Rafa Nadal 10 Times French Open Tennis Winner

Rafa Nadal 10 Times French Open Tennis Winner…

Bravo Rafa! - La Decima! - Image Copyright Spin.Ph - AP

Bravo Rafa! - La Decima! - Image Copyright Spin.Ph - AP

Bravo Rafa! – La Decima! – Image Copyright Spin.Ph – AP

Bravo Rafa! – La Decima! beyond impressive! MAGNIFICENT!

Not the best of his great 10 wins at the legendary Roland Garros, but never less a win that will never be forgotten and could stay in the record books for ever. Clay court tennis players of the calibre of Rafael Nadal are hard to find in fact he is unique, no one has ever won the French Open Tennis Championship ten times…

This is simply a phenomenal achievement, that was magical for all who watched around the world and the full house at the iconic Roland Garros Stadium – Bravo Rafa!

Stan Wawrinka lost 6-2 6-3 6-1 and was never really in the game, such was the difference in class Rafa Nadal is arguably the best tennis player ever to adorn and entertain on a clay court anywhere in the world…

But to win be 10 Times French Open Tennis Winner at Roland Garros is quite simply MAGNIFICENT! Bravo Rafa! – La Decima!

Rafa Nadal 10 Times French Open Tennis Winner…


Rafael Nadal – meaning ten times French Open Tennis Winner!

2005 – Rafael Nadal French Open Tennis Winner!

2006 – Rafael Nadal French Open Tennis Winner!

2007 – Rafael Nadal French Open Tennis Winner!

2008 – Rafael Nadal French Open Tennis Winner!

2008 – Rafael Nadal French Open Tennis Winner!

2010 – Rafael Nadal French Open Tennis Winner!

2011 – Rafael Nadal French Open Tennis Winner!

2013 – Rafael Nadal French Open Tennis Winner!

2014 – Rafael Nadal French Open Tennis Winner!

2017 – Rafael Nadal French Open Tennis Winner!

England vs Australia Group A ICC Champions Trophy 2017

England vs Australia Group A ICC Champions Trophy 2017…

Mark Wood - Image Copyright Express.Co.Uk

Mark Wood - Image Copyright Express.Co.Uk

Mark Wood – Image Copyright Express.Co.Uk

Saturday 10th June 2017

Edgbaston – Birmingham – England

Toss:England won the toss and decided to field Australia batted first and scored a below average 277 for 9.


Aaron Finch
David Warner
Steven Smith(c)
Moises Henriques
Travis Head
Glenn Maxwell
Matthew Wade(wk)
Mitchell Starc
Pat Cummins
Adam Zampa
Josh Hazlewood

Impressive bowling by Mark Wood and Adil Rashid with 4 wickets each…


Jason Roy
Alex Hales
Joe Root
Eoin Morgan(c)
Ben Stokes
Jos Buttler(wk)
Moeen Ali
Adil Rashid
Liam Plunkett
Mark Wood
Jake Ball

England chasing a moderate total lost 3 wickets quickly and were struggling at 35 for 3 when rain stopped play, after the break Morgan and Stokes started to build a partnership. They put on 50 runs together then quickly developed that into 100 runs, with over 50 runs to both Morgan and Stokes. England back in the game and looking good, the runs gathered pace to 151 runs in the partnership from 143 balls… Australia were getting hit all over the park sixes and fours aplenty… Then after a fantastic spell Morgan was run out for 87, leaving England in sight of victory at 194 for 4, ending a Morgan – Stokes record partnership of 159 runs. High quality cricket was order of the day!

England powered on to for 240 for 4 when rain stopped play for the second time, with England way ahead on the D/L Method…

England win by 40 runs (D/L Method)

England win once again making it 3 games – 3 wins!

England vs Australia Group A ICC Champions Trophy 2017…

Brits Reject Eject XMay Ideas Totally! BREXIT In Limbo!

Brits Reject Eject XMay Ideas Totally! BREXIT In Limbo!

Get Out - Image Copyright Giphy.Com

Get Out - Image Copyright Giphy.Com

Get Out – Image Copyright Giphy.Com

UK General Election 2017 showed no interest in voting for “That Woman” aloof detached Prime Minister May, as in the woman who could not be bothered to campaign instead she went for a walk in the Welsh Mountains!

Hapless clueless out of touch loser Theresa May sealed what most people believed that she has not got a single clue on how to run UK!

What happens next? Well Theresa May will vouch she is staying in power. But that avarice and BS will be toppled by her own party the Tories who will now find a way to kick her out of office. Who will engineer her exit? Step forward the only man with the guts to stand up to May, now is your time Boris Johnson!

Why has May been rejected? Two thirds of all voters aged 18 to 24 were not having May, they voted Labour! Which all means that it is now likely with a hung parliament that yet another general election will have to be called in 2017. A minority government will be rejected totally by all the UK voters…

At long last the UK are having a say in what goes on in their lives! They are sick and tired of being shafted by every government that has been in power for the last two decades and more… The fear in this election was that dictatorial Theresa May was going to go it alone to negotiate a “Hard BREXIT”

UK voted to reject that in the UK General Election 2017!

Brits Reject Eject XMay Ideas Totally! BREXIT In Limbo!…

US Political System Is Fatally Fractured

US Political System Is Fatally Fractured…

Our Corrupt Political System - Image Copyright UsActionNews.Com

Our Corrupt Political System - Image Copyright UsActionNews.Com

Our Corrupt Political System – Image Copyright UsActionNews.Com

In the USA everything is broken – fractured – divided – apart – split you all get the drift nothing works in Washington the town where nothing gets done… The epi center of arguments – feuds – disagreements – abuse – hate – venom and a cacophony of disparaging partisan bureaucrats and inept politicians…

Let’s make it clear it is a privilege and lifelong bonus for all who work in government offices throughout all the states in USA. The job commitment is to work and serve the general public, while at the same time never applying a political bias to any task or event!

But the reality is very different, to the degree that everyone and everything in the US Political System has a divisive objective. As in apply for healthcare only to be faced with a plethora of obstacles and hoops to jump through just to see a doctor, that is see the doctor as long as you have the money to pay… New jobs? Hey that is not going to happen because the Democrats will block any bill that develops new jobs. Cut personal taxes? Same any bill will be opposed by the Democrats.

Where is the fracture in 2017? Easy one word! RUSSIA…

The Washington swamp are guilty of dereliction of duty as every day of 2017 the subject has been – RUSSIA – RUSSIA – RUSSIA – RUSSIA – RUSSIA – RUSSIA – RUSSIA – RUSSIA – RUSSIA…. and on it goes…

Meanwhile governing the country is on the back burner!

US Political System Is Fatally Fractured…

Shepard Smith Always Negative On President Trump!

Shepard Smith Always Negative On President Trump…

Shepard Smith Goes Bat-sh't Crazy On Air! - Anti-Trump Rant - Image Copyright TruthFeed.Com

Shepard Smith Goes Bat-sh't Crazy On Air! - Anti-Trump Rant - Image Copyright TruthFeed.Com

Shepard Smith Goes Bat-sh’t Crazy On Air! – Anti-Trump Rant – Image Copyright TruthFeed.Com

Hey Murdochs’ there is nothing “Fair & Balanced & Unafraid” about that loser Shepard Smith! So you guys run multi billion dollar businesses and you are always ruthless quick to discard any loser! Hence why is Shepard Smith still in a job, he is killing the hard earned reputation of Fox News…

You guys got it all wrong with Roger Ailes – Bill Shine – Bill O’Reilly all were shown the exit door… The reason was based on financial decisions (no point in giving details everyone knows the story) the narrative has many angles but strip them all down and the end game comes up with the same $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ money – how much – how much has been lost – what will the losses be going forward, get the drift – the Murdoch’s are not politicians they are hard nosed business executives!

To put the record straight Rupert Murdoch and his smart – savvy two sons are some of the best press and media business people in the world – they have decades of success – year after year of making billions of dollars $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ – global operators in many countries – ooze with experience and know how! Hence with that collective expertise why are they not firing hapless Shepard Smith!

Surely his exit from Fox News is long overdue. What is the reason for his continuity? Surely it cannot be the cost of paying off his Fox News contract after all they paid off Roger Ailes – Bill Shine – Bill O’Reilly – and others without the blink of an eye…

So maybe the next question to be asked does Shepard Smith know things about Fox News that the Murdoch’s do not want to be released to the general public! That could be so, as Rupert Murdoch is smart enough, that any gagging order he may want to put on Shepard Smith if he fired him, would not hold water as Smith would use anonymous surrogates to leak all the facts!

There is a lot of instability in Fox News these days and the brand is under pressure to retain the position of being number 1 in USA press and media news…

Finally will it be Shepard Smith who gets the next exit bullet from Fox News!

Shepard Smith Always Negative On President Trump…

2107 US Congress & Senate Must Stop Bickering!

2107 US Congress & Senate Must Stop Bickering…

Stop This Bickering - Partisanship Is Hurting Us! - Image Copright StaticFlickr.Com

Stop This Bickering - Partisanship Is Hurting Us! - Image Copright StaticFlickr.Com

Stop This Bickering – Partisanship Is Hurting Us!

The purpose of any government in any country is to govern and manage the respective community. However that does not always happen and of course sometimes dictators – military coups et al may also come into the equation.

Now what has happened with the unique USA government the leading light of democracy, is that as long as enough money is poured into the funds of any presidential candidate results in an elected democratic POTUS. In other words the candidate with the most funds and/or cash will likely win any election and as so, be judged qualified to be, as in the USA – POTUS… But hey, the voters have often been conned into the way they cast the vote… Meaning they have succumbed to all the advertisements and promotion. This is natural that is how marketing and promoting works…

Enough of that as the savvy USA electorate know all that, but maybe the direction they vote, is often influenced by hope not belief as in the dream is to get a government which actually cares about careful management and protection of the voters…

Hence on that belief that is why NewsPressed kicked off with the above rubric because the USA government are not delivering quite simply because almost everyone in the WH – White House – Congress and Senate are all bickering. Which of course means that the tax deduction plan – healthcare – jobs – et al are all on hold. This means that as is the norm in recent years the USA political quagmire is gridlocked – polluted – stagnant and stinking of dereliction of duty. Yes the elected government officials and politicians are simply not delivering! Leaving the US folks aghast – annoyed and very frustrated, that nothing is happening and worse still no one cares…

As in the US press and media just love and feast on the infighting – the upfront bickering – the backbiting – the lying – the deceit – the deception – the incompetence – the self serving – the ego preening – all the while the press do there level best to keep stoking the fire – the more coal they feed the Washington swamp. The bickering erupts into flames that power into the WH – White House where there is no escape as the WH fire chimney is blocked and chocker full of the Team Trump spewing venom at each other simply because each and everyone of the WH inner circle are only interesting in self as in getting browning points that will make them look good in the eyes of President Trump…

That about briefly summarizes the rubric to reach the conclusion that anything and everything that happens in the WH circa 2017 is a joke that is not funny – but thanks to USA press and media it is nothing more than a never ending circus of incompetence! Time to sign off as all this political behavior is a national and international disgrace!

2107 US Congress & Senate Must Stop Bickering…

Dim Megyn Kelly Brushed Off By Vladimir Putin!

Dim Megyn Kelly Brushed Off By Vladimir Putin…

Vladimir Putin Laughing - GIF Copyright GoogleUserContent.Com

Vladimir Putin Laughing - GIF Copyright GoogleUserContent.Com

Vladimir Putin Laughing – GIF Copyright GoogleUserContent.Com

Well folks anyone want an explanation of the rubric?

Let’s start by laying out the scenario a dim hack from the USA with an ego that towers above the Paris skyline looking down on the Eiffel Tower…

Get the drift a nobody hovering around like an obsolete drone that has been released from digital control – free at last to drift into oblivion. Yes Megyn Kelly has long since been brushed off into oblivion…

This news hack is at best third rate – fails to do research on interview questions – fails to do background profiling on interview subjects – cannot get past her huge ego and self that gets in the way of any news feature she attempts to present…

Here is what happened in the interview Megyn Kelly versus Vladimir Putin. First mistake the interview should have been ‘with’ not ‘versus’ fatal error making it all confrontational instead of engaging…

The belief that attack mode is the best formula to get the most revealing answers is so far off the mark, this approach is an elementary – no – no!

So as the interview kicked off on the wrong foot, it was obvious that super smart Vladimir Putin was going to school Megyn Kelly. Boy did he do just that, it was great to watch how this inept news hack was dismissed as easily as if Putin had a spec of dust on his clothes, that all was needed to remove the spec was a waft of the hand…

Putin was so smart that his body language eclipsed Kelly from the start and in a body gesture switched off the dim light in front of him… But he was not done with that he was yet to speak – it was classic when he did! He casually said – “That’s completely nonsense! Do you even understand what you’re asking, or not?” Enough said that was the interview done one body language gesture – one spoken sentence – and Putin said thanks for the interview and casually ended the fiasco of an interview!

Pretty sure Newt Gingrich – Mike Huckabee and many more enjoyed the Vladimir Putin dismissal show!

Dim Megyn Kelly Brushed Off By Vladimir Putin…


Dim – meaning – faint – weak – feeble – not shining brightly or clearly and much more…

2017 UK Islamist Extremism Exactly As Enoch Powell Forecast

2017 UK Islamist Extremism Exactly As Enoch Powell Forecast…

Enoch Powell - Image Copyright BirminghamMail.Co.Uk

Enoch Powell - Image Copyright BirminghamMail.Co.Uk

Enoch Powell – Image Copyright BirminghamMail.Co.Uk

2017 has been a disaster in UK overwhelmed by “Islamist Extremism” major terrorists attacks on London Bridge – Manchester Arena and now one more time on London Bridge…

Enough is Enough! The UK government must act and they must act now!

PC Political Correctness has strangled the life out of the UK and now no one is allowed to call a spade a spade. On what grounds? Who knows something like some left wing university dishwasher saying that a spade is a device that can be used in – gardens – building sites – construction yards and the like et al. The reason why they will have put a PC spin on a spade is because they will be the self same people who have taught terrorists how to use a spade to chop people up and/or kill innocent folks…

So what can be done in UK stop Islamist Extremism? That question opens up a mass of answers – many that will not improve this what now seems to heading towards a situation wherein Islamist Extremism will never be purged for ever from the UK!

Many young men and women have no understanding about history, however it is never too late to learn – starting by reading the legend below where there is full draft of The famous “Rivers Of Blood” speech by Enoch Powell in 1968…

2017 UK Islamist Extremism Exactly As Enoch Powell Forecast…


Enoch Powell - meaning – The famous “Rivers Of Blood” speech in 1968 to the Conservative Political Centre in Birmingham, UK.

The full text is quoted here…

The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.

One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.

Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: “If only,” they love to think, “if only people wouldn’t talk about it, it probably wouldn’t happen.”

Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.

At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after.

A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalised industries.

After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: “If I had the money to go, I wouldn’t stay in this country.” I made some deprecatory reply to the effect that even this government wouldn’t last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: “I have three children, all of them been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan’t be satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or 20 years’ time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.”

I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?

The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.

I simply do not have the right to shrug my shoulders and think about something else. What he is saying, thousands and hundreds of thousands are saying and thinking – not throughout Great Britain, perhaps, but in the areas that are already undergoing the total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history.

In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General’s Office.

There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London. Of course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.

As time goes on, the proportion of this total who are immigrant descendants, those born in England, who arrived here by exactly the same route as the rest of us, will rapidly increase. Already by 1985 the native-born would constitute the majority. It is this fact which creates the extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimised lie several parliaments ahead.

The natural and rational first question with a nation confronted by such a prospect is to ask: “How can its dimensions be reduced?”

Granted it be not wholly preventable, can it be limited, bearing in mind that numbers are of the essence: the significance and consequences of an alien element introduced into a country or population are profoundly different according to whether that element is 1 per cent or 10 per cent.

The answers to the simple and rational question are equally simple and rational: by stopping, or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting the maximum outflow. Both answers are part of the official policy of the Conservative Party.

It almost passes belief that at this moment 20 or 30 additional immigrant children are arriving from overseas in Wolverhampton alone every week – and that means 15 or 20 additional families a decade or two hence. Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre. So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiance’s whom they have never seen.

Let no one suppose that the flow of dependants will automatically tail off. On the contrary, even at the present admission rate of only 5,000 a year by voucher, there is sufficient for a further 25,000 dependants per annum ad infinitum, without taking into account the huge reservoir of existing relations in this country – and I am making no allowance at all for fraudulent entry. In these circumstances nothing will suffice but that the total inflow for settlement should be reduced at once to negligible proportions, and that the necessary legislative and administrative measures be taken without delay.

I stress the words “for settlement.” This has nothing to do with the entry of Commonwealth citizens, any more than of aliens, into this country, for the purposes of study or of improving their qualifications, like (for instance) the Commonwealth doctors who, to the advantage of their own countries, have enabled our hospital service to be expanded faster than would otherwise have been possible. They are not, and never have been, immigrants.

I turn to re-emigration. If all immigration ended tomorrow, the rate of growth of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population would be substantially reduced, but the prospective size of this element in the population would still leave the basic character of the national danger unaffected. This can only be tackled while a considerable proportion of the total still comprises persons who entered this country during the last ten years or so.

Hence the urgency of implementing now the second element of the Conservative Party’s policy: the encouragement of re-emigration.

Nobody can make an estimate of the numbers which, with generous assistance, would choose either to return to their countries of origin or to go to other countries anxious to receive the manpower and the skills they represent.

Nobody knows, because no such policy has yet been attempted. I can only say that, even at present, immigrants in my own constituency from time to time come to me, asking if I can find them assistance to return home. If such a policy were adopted and pursued with the determination which the gravity of the alternative justifies, the resultant outflow could appreciably alter the prospects.

The third element of the Conservative Party’s policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. As Mr Heath has put it we will have no “first-class citizens” and “second-class citizens.” This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendent should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow-citizen and another or that he should be subjected to imposition as to his reasons and motive for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another.

There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it “against discrimination”, whether they be leader-writers of the same kidney and sometimes on the same newspapers which year after year in the 1930s tried to blind this country to the rising peril which confronted it, or archbishops who live in palaces, faring delicately with the bedclothes pulled right up over their heads. They have got it exactly and diametrically wrong.

The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming.

This is why to enact legislation of the kind before parliament at this moment is to risk throwing a match on to gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about those who propose and support it is that they know not what they do.

Nothing is more misleading than comparison between the Commonwealth immigrant in Britain and the American Negro. The Negro population of the United States, which was already in existence before the United States became a nation, started literally as slaves and were later given the franchise and other rights of citizenship, to the exercise of which they have only gradually and still incompletely come. The Commonwealth immigrant came to Britain as a full citizen, to a country which knew no discrimination between one citizen and another, and he entered instantly into the possession of the rights of every citizen, from the vote to free treatment under the National Health Service.

Whatever drawbacks attended the immigrants arose not from the law or from public policy or from administration, but from those personal circumstances and accidents which cause, and always will cause, the fortunes and experience of one man to be different from another’s.

But while, to the immigrant, entry to this country was admission to privileges and opportunities eagerly sought, the impact upon the existing population was very different. For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country.

They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted. They now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by act of parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent-provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.

In the hundreds upon hundreds of letters I received when I last spoke on this subject two or three months ago, there was one striking feature which was largely new and which I find ominous. All Members of Parliament are used to the typical anonymous correspondent; but what surprised and alarmed me was the high proportion of ordinary, decent, sensible people, writing a rational and often well-educated letter, who believed that they had to omit their address because it was dangerous to have committed themselves to paper to a Member of Parliament agreeing with the views I had expressed, and that they would risk penalties or reprisals if they were known to have done so. The sense of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without direct experience can hardly imagine.

I am going to allow just one of those hundreds of people to speak for me:

“Eight years ago in a respectable street in Wolverhampton a house was sold to a Negro. Now only one white (a woman old-age pensioner) lives there. This is her story. She lost her husband and both her sons in the war. So she turned her seven-roomed house, her only asset, into a boarding house. She worked hard and did well, paid off her mortgage and began to put something by for her old age. Then the immigrants moved in. With growing fear, she saw one house after another taken over. The quiet street became a place of noise and confusion. Regretfully, her white tenants moved out.

“The day after the last one left, she was awakened at 7am by two Negroes who wanted to use her ‘phone to contact their employer. When she refused, as she would have refused any stranger at such an hour, she was abused and feared she would have been attacked but for the chain on her door. Immigrant families have tried to rent rooms in her house, but she always refused. Her little store of money
went, and after paying rates, she has less than 2 Pounds per week. “She went to apply for a rate reduction and was seen by a young girl, who on hearing she had a seven-roomed house, suggested she should let part of it. When she said the only people she could get were Negroes, the girl said, “Racial prejudice won’t get you anywhere in this country.” So she went home.

“The telephone is her lifeline. Her family pay the bill, and help her out as best they can. Immigrants have offered to buy her house – at a price which the prospective landlord would be able to recover from his tenants in weeks, or at most a few months. She is becoming afraid to go out. Windows are broken. She finds excreta pushed through her letter box. When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning piccaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know. “Racialist,” they chant. When the new Race Relations Bill is passed, this woman is convinced she will go to prison. And is she so wrong? I begin to wonder.”

The other dangerous delusion from which those who are wilfully or otherwise blind to realities suffer, is summed up in the word “integration.” To be integrated into a population means to become for all practical purposes indistinguishable from its other members.

Now, at all times, where there are marked physical differences, especially of colour, integration is difficult though, over a period, not impossible. There are among the Commonwealth immigrants who have come to live here in the last fifteen years or so, many thousands whose wish and purpose is to be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction.

But to imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous one.

We are on the verge here of a change. Hitherto it has been force of circumstance and of background which has rendered the very idea of integration inaccessible to the greater part of the immigrant population – that they never conceived or intended such a thing, and that their numbers and physical concentration meant the pressures towards integration which normally bear upon any small minority did
not operate.

Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, of vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences, with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow-immigrants and then over the rest of the population. The cloud no bigger than a man’s hand, that can so rapidly overcast the sky, has been visible recently in
Wolverhampton and has shown signs of spreading quickly. The words I am about to use, verbatim as they appeared in the local press on 17 February, are not mine, but those of a Labour Member of Parliament who is a minister in the present government:

‘The Sikh communities’ campaign to maintain customs inappropriate in Britain is much to be regretted. Working in Britain, particularly in the public services, they should be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of their employment. To claim special communal rights (or should one say rites?) leads to a dangerous fragmentation within society. This communalism is a canker; whether practised by one colour or another it is to be strongly condemned.’

All credit to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage to say it.

For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organise to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see “the River Tiber foaming with much blood.”

That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century.

Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.

The End…

2017 UK Islamist Extremism Exactly As Enoch Powell Forecast…

Megyn Kelly This Egotist Is Dangerous!

Megyn Kelly This Egotist Is Dangerous…

Memes About Me They're Accurate, Essentially - Image Copyright QuickMeme.Com

Memes About Me They're Accurate, Essentially - Image Copyright QuickMeme.Com

Memes About Me They’re Accurate, Essentially – Image Copyright QuickMeme.Com

Z lister bottom feeder news imposter Megyn Kelly is back, after taking time out after a questionable exit from Fox News. She is now working for some news outfit – the name of is not worthy of a mention…

The first report is allegedly an interview with Vladimir Putin. Which will be sold in the USA with a bucket full of bluster and hubris… Folks do not believe a word on how the Vladimir Putin interview is sold and promoted.

Let’s tell the real storyline as seen through the eyes of the Russian propaganda apparatus, they will simply use Megyn Kelly as the naive – dopey – news imposter she is! Vladimir Putin will control what he releases in the interview and the message he lays out will be exactly what he wants – he cannot be manipulated when facing an interview when across the table is an irrelevant lightweight like Megyn Kelly!

Folks to see how nasty – dirty and respectful Megyn Kelly can be see here an interview with Newt Gingrich – Right Here! – Right Now!

SR1293 “You’re Fascinated w/ Sex!” Newt Gingrich BLASTS Megyn Kelly -Calling Trump Sexual Predator

“You\'re Fascinated w/ Sex!\" Newt Gingrich BLASTS Megyn Kelly – Calling Trump Sexual Predator

With some comments attribution YouTube.Com

Rob Abreu

She was intentionally antagonizing Gingrich. I’ve wondered why Trump had a problem with her, now I see why.?

Alejandra Valles

I can’t believe what I was hearing when I was watching the show… I was applauding whenever Mr Gingrich slap her with the truth… but she was disrespectful, unprofessional, totally pro-Killary and a disgrace for the patriotic women who used to watch Fox news…

she must start packing her stuff and start looking for a new job at CNN… but imagining the bad ratings she has been having lately, I don’t think she can have a show even there… YOU’RE A DISGRACE AS A REPORTER SMELLY KELLY!!!!!! … YOU AND THE ONE YOU ARE KISSING HER OLD, NASTY, AND WRINKLED ASS…. SHAME ON YOU FOX NEWS CHANNEL…. SHAME ON YOU!!!!!!!!!?

Daniel Benitez

This is the first time I have ever been impressed with newt Gingrich. She may think she got the better of him, but she showed her manipulative and deceptive ways and a seething passive aggressive anger and people aren’t dumb enough to not notice that?

Nay Nay

LOL Bill O Reilly said they called her Me-again-Kelly because of how pretentious she was to make everything about her?

Moving on the Megyn Kelly freak news show is targeting Alex Jones

InfoWars Megyn Kelly To Interview Alex Jones

With yet another choice comment…


Annnnndddd, why even entertain her? Why give her ratings? Why give her any credibility? She disappeared a while ago, only to be brought back…why?

Get the drift folks the USA and the rest of the world has seen enough of Megyn Kelly for a lifetimes viewing…

She is roasted irrelevant – a waste of time – not worth viewing anytime of the day!

Megyn Kelly This Egotist Is Dangerous…

2017 USA A Country That Has Lost It!

2017 USA A Country That Has Lost It…

Map Of The World USA Edition - Image Copyright PinImg.Com

Map Of The World USA Edition - Image Copyright PinImg.Com

Map Of The World USA Edition – Image Copyright PinImg.Com

Re the rubric whoever would say that? Inside USA who knows as they are in the most, living in the dark. Then there is the self acclaimed elite and the super rich who only care about making money… Then the more they have, the more they can flaunt obscene wealth in the faces of the poor and have nots…

What a dire – tardy – shambles – gridlocked politics – out of touch Hollywood – fake news – reality stars as in Z listers on every screen and/or street corner – food stamps – inadequate minimum wage structure – conspiracies – corruption – on and on it goes never ending!

How does the rest of the world view USA? Is that question a joke! As the stock in trade answer to the query is that nearly one and all residents of countries looking in on the USA – just laugh and saw as that place some sort of a joke. So the question answer is resounding one word retort “JOKE”… Sad but that is the reality these days…

The halcyon days when President Ronald Reagan engendered global respect from all corners on earth, are long gone, likely to be never seen again. In 2017 the world is a very different place USA is no longer the global leader (the phony news and inept politicians try to fool people they are) the movers n shakers in the world of today are…

Military Wise – Russia & China if antagonized by the USA they will always present a threat that USA will be foolish to ever make a military attack on either Russia and/or China…

Economy Strength – The USA dollar is a busted flush the country is $20 Trillion Dollars in debt. That burden which is increasing on a daily basis means that the USA and the $ dollar in reality is no longer the strongest currency base in the world. China Renmimbi is the new king and the astute Chinese know it! Moreover worryingly USA do not recognize the strength of the Chinese Renmimbi…

Manufacturing Base – Another joke subject USA is similar to the UK and other European countries thet may as well be just warehouses storing billions of dollars of imported products. The incumbent President Trump led USA government have an agenda to revive the manufacturing bases in many vertical markets and create millions of new jobs. The problem is that without doubt President Trump has the right idea, but rest assured his plans are going to blocked and balked relentlessly by the gridlocked Washington political swamp. Summary nothing much is going to change in USA manufacturing, while China will just go from strength to strength they have the know how – they have the factories and they have the skilled workforce!

We could go on and on but why? As it is sad and embarrassing what has happened in the States… The self inflicted demise, is so drastic that some decision makers should be held to account.

2017 USA A Country That Has Lost It…

Copyright © NewsPressed – Global News and Events | Co-Powered by: WordPress & TriGem Solutions